As part of the online submission authors are requested to fill out the online submission form prior to the manuscript attachment such as: Title, Full name, Email, Contact, University, Journal, Manuscript title and attach the file and then submit. Alternately send as an e-mail attachment to the Editorial Office at

Review Process

Peer review is the process of evaluating theauthors work by one or more people of similar research interests. This is a critical part of the functioning of the scientific community, of quality control, and the self-corrective nature of science. It helps the authors to improve the quality of paper.

Sometimes scientists find the peer review process intimidating because it can lead to the rejection of their manuscript. Keep in mind that revisions and improvement are part of the publication process and actually help raise the quality of your manuscript.

Peer review is an integral process of scientific publishing that confirms the validity of the science reported. Peer reviewers are experts in the related fields who volunteer their time to help improve the journal manuscripts quality and offers free and valuable advice to the authors.

Apart from offering advices to authors by our editors and reviewers, another major purpose of peer review is to make sure that the manuscripts of the journal eventually publishes are of high quality. If a journal publishes any low-quality manuscripts, its reputation and number of readers will decline.

Some of the articles may be rejected during the peer-review process due to the below reasons.

  • No proper structure.
  • Lack of novelty.
  • Lacks the necessary detail for readers.
  • Fails to explain which parts of the findings are new.
  • Lack of up-to-date references.
  • Contains theories, concepts, or conclusions that are not fully supported by its data, arguments, and information.
  • Fails to provide enough details about materials and methods.
  • Lacks clear descriptions or explanations.
  • Has poor language quality.

Publication is a difficult process.So, the authors must be prepared to defend their submission against rejection from both editors and peer reviewers.

When revising the manuscript and responding to peer-review comments we suggest the authors as below:

  • Address all points raised by the editor and reviewers.
  • Explain the revisions to your manuscript in your response letter.
  • If the author won’t agree to the review comments then providing a polite and scientific rebuttal to any points or comments is necessary.
  • Respond to the comments point wise for better understanding.
  • Showing the major revision in the manuscript using text high or with Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature is necessary.
  • Submit the revised manuscript in time. Authors may send a mail to editorial office in case of extension to respond the comments.

We, Science Text Publishers assure the authors that we are on the track to provide the best quality in terms of review process and other editorial assistance.